http://blogonsc.com Political and social commentary from your average South Carolina guys point of view Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:53:15 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://blogonsc.com/2009/03/you-tube-diplomacy-barak-obama-seen-as-weak/comment-page-1/#comment-117 Iran And YouTube Diplomacy One Year Later | BlogOnSC.com Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:53:15 +0000 http://blogonsc.com/?p=826#comment-117 [...] hopes” and “common dreams” of “peace between nations.” I labeled it YouTube Diplomacy then and said that it was destined to be a complete failure.  Here it is a year later and what has [...] [...] hopes” and “common dreams” of “peace between nations.” I labeled it YouTube Diplomacy then and said that it was destined to be a complete failure.  Here it is a year later and what has [...]

]]> http://blogonsc.com/2009/09/all-the-presidents-czars/comment-page-1/#comment-116 BlogOnSC Fri, 29 Jan 2010 04:05:45 +0000 http://blogonsc.com/?p=1632#comment-116 All the information I have found indicate that the term Czar was applied to FDR's appointments. It's possible that they were referred to as "dictators" by some, I'm just not certain of that. Thanks for reading and taking the time to post a comment. All the information I have found indicate that the term Czar was applied to FDR’s appointments. It’s possible that they were referred to as “dictators” by some, I’m just not certain of that.
Thanks for reading and taking the time to post a comment.

]]> http://blogonsc.com/2009/09/all-the-presidents-czars/comment-page-1/#comment-115 Old VWs are COOL Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:56:46 +0000 http://blogonsc.com/?p=1632#comment-115 Weren't FDR's czars originally refered to as DICTATORS? Weren’t FDR’s czars originally refered to as DICTATORS?

]]> http://blogonsc.com/2009/09/maureen-dowd-plays-the-race-card/comment-page-1/#comment-114 Harry Reid Resign? Congress Should Resig | BlogOnSC.com Sun, 10 Jan 2010 20:35:03 +0000 http://blogonsc.com/?p=1650#comment-114 [...] to mention, there was nothing racist in a “you lie” comment, contrary to columnist Maureen Dowd’s assertion Joe Wilson is a racist, whereas Reid’s comment could easily be construed as racist.  So it seems the left screams [...] [...] to mention, there was nothing racist in a “you lie” comment, contrary to columnist Maureen Dowd’s assertion Joe Wilson is a racist, whereas Reid’s comment could easily be construed as racist.  So it seems the left screams [...]

]]> http://blogonsc.com/2010/01/the-truth-about-obama-and-executive-order-12425/comment-page-1/#comment-113 BlogOnSC Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:51:20 +0000 http://blogonsc.com/?p=1924#comment-113 sk1951, Thanks for reading and leaving a comment. Your readership is appreciated and it's an honor when someone leaves a comment such as yours. I certainly don't think what Obama did in regards to amending the executive order is a "wonderful thing." I'm just a bit ambivalent to it. What I am trying to shed some light on is the fact that it was NOT Obama who gave foreign entities immunities, it was NOT Obama who approved of INTERPOL as one of those foreign entities and most of what Obama did was take away the provisions which allowed INTERPOL to be taxed by the U.S. government. It's been 26+ years since Reagan issued the original E.O. giving INTERPOL status. That's a long time, but he opened the can of worms which has put us in this position. Which leads to the whole question of whether or not executive orders should even be allowed since they are not constitutional to begin with. Thank you again for your interest and for the link to the other article. sk1951,
Thanks for reading and leaving a comment. Your readership is appreciated and it’s an honor when someone leaves a comment such as yours.
I certainly don’t think what Obama did in regards to amending the executive order is a “wonderful thing.” I’m just a bit ambivalent to it.
What I am trying to shed some light on is the fact that it was NOT Obama who gave foreign entities immunities, it was NOT Obama who approved of INTERPOL as one of those foreign entities and most of what Obama did was take away the provisions which allowed INTERPOL to be taxed by the U.S. government.
It’s been 26+ years since Reagan issued the original E.O. giving INTERPOL status. That’s a long time, but he opened the can of worms which has put us in this position. Which leads to the whole question of whether or not executive orders should even be allowed since they are not constitutional to begin with.
Thank you again for your interest and for the link to the other article.

]]>